32 identify note 31 above.
Regarding the tool the quantity thereon that is due ten times of the manufacturers’ receipt of notice through the owner that re re payment happens to be refused by the drawee, the court or jury may infer from such facts that the manufacturer knew that the tool wouldn’t be compensated on presentation.
Because the language associated with statute suggests, the essential difference between an ordinary bounced check while the crime of composing a useless (« cold ») check is intent. For purposes of interpreting the unlawful statute, the appropriate time and energy to glance at the manufacturer’s intent may be the time of which the check had been written. 33